EYP Talk - Your voice on Europe's future. This is the online forum of the European Youth Parliament in the UK.

The Challenge of Climate Change

The challenge of climate change: how can people and governments across Europe help to tackle this global threat?

The panellists in this discussion are:

Mark Avery
Director of Conservation, RSPB

Mark Avery is a scientist by training who heads up the RSPB’s conservation work – from nature reserves to species reintroductions and from research on threatened birds to lobbying government on land use policies that affect wildlife. He has solar panels on his house, gets his energy from RSPB Energy – a green energy scheme – but has to admit to having well-exceeded his lifetime allocation of air travel.

David Baldock
Director, Institute for European Environmental Policy

David Baldock is the Director of the Institute for European Environmental Policy, an independent think tank that seeks to encourage positive environmental policies in Europe. As well as being an authority on European agricultural policy and the environment, David’s specialist areas include the implementation of environmental legislation; and EU strategy with regard to environmental integration. He has an active interest in sustainable development and the external dimension of European policy.

Catherine Stihler MEP

Catherine Stihler has been a Member of the European Parliament representing Scotland since 1999. She is a member of the European Parliament’s Fisheries Committee, Regional Development Committee, and a substitute member on the Transport and Tourism Committee. She is Labour’s European Spokesperson for Fisheries and also for Regional Policy. She is also the Vice President of the Moscow Platform. She served as Deputy Leader of the European Parliamentary Labour Party from 2004 – 2006.

XML feed XML feed

Climate change

Posted by chris.mackin on 12/01/2007 - 12:16

Dear All,

My name is Chris Mackin, I am a member of EYPUK and I study in Edinburgh university, with European Studies as my main subject area. I have been browsing through the comments thus far in this discussion and would like to raise some points.

First of all, with regards to what Rich(ard) has said, even if the research statistics, media stories, official government and parliamentary releases, and European Commission green papers are simply scaremongering (which personally I dont believe they are) should we not be striving for a way to preserve our natural resources in order to be able to sustain our planet and provide our children with as good an existence as we have at the moment? It is with this in mind that I wholeheartedly support what Mr Avery has said, as I believe reducing our dependancy on coal, oil, and gas is paramount to our childrens future.

Secondly, and with regards to the Commissions proposals, I went onto the Europa website scanning for the EU budget expecting to be posting on this forum to state that I thought the proposals of the increase of 50% of the Energy budget was ludicrous. However, after reading the budget I would argue that an increase of 50% does NOT go far enough. This is our planet we are talking about. Do we want to see more flooding in the UK? Even less snow in the Alps? I for one do not want to take a trip to Latvia in january and find that my dream of a snowy Riga has not materialised! I can make lighthearted comments, but this is a serious issue. Could spending on energy research not be increased further, perhaps by 75% or by the same 50% over a shorter time period, e.g. 5 years?

With developing nations, whilst focus should undoubtedly be on reducing poverty levels and aiding through structural funds, we should ensure that when infrastructure is being developed, it should be done using more sustainable and renewable energy resources. While initial costs may be higher, this will be offset by reduced costs in the future, and hopefully a more prosperous nation.

I look forward to reading further comments on this topic and hope that through our discussions we can make a difference!